37signals logo

This is Signal vs. Noise, a weblog by 37signals about design, business, experience, simplicity, the web, culture, and more. Established 1999 in Chicago. Follow us on Twitter for more information on our products.

Jobs:

See more on our Job Board.

Quoted by Matt on June 9 2009:

Big, as a business model (let alone as an expression of the national mood), seems bound for obsolescence.

Looking for a job? Got a position to fill? Check out the Job Board.
Got a web design project in mind? Find a web designer on Sortfolio. Browse by visual style, portfolio, budget, and geographic location.
Over 1 million people use 37signals' simple web-based software to collaborate on projects, track contacts, and organize their business with an intranet.

9 comments so far

Spencer Fry 09 Jun 09

With fewer investors out there, entrepreneurs are forced to keep things small and grow organically. It’s certainly a good thing for the consumer.

Dave! 09 Jun 09

Size only scratches the surface of the problems with the “BIGLAW” business model.

GeeIWonder 09 Jun 09

Wow. I disagree. Big is in. Ask India, China, or any of the other populous G77 that are primed to

I think America may be moving towards small, and therefore America’s lawfirms and economy must follow and focus on specialization and increased efficiencies, like others have done before. That’s ok, but don’t mistake predictable patterns of state-centered realism as a conscious ‘lesson learned’ in something akin to defensive realism.

GeeIWonder 09 Jun 09

*primed to pounce

Erik 09 Jun 09

I disagree—the big guys will always have a spot. It’s just everyone is down on the big guys right now because of the economy and such. They’re not going anywhere.

On a separate note, that article is not a very good one. “A Study in Why Major Law Firms Are Shrinking”...a study perhaps, but by the slimmest of margins.

pwb 09 Jun 09

I think this is a very interesting topic. There’s a widespread perception that bigger is better and that the benefits of being bigger outweigh the detriments. I’m wondering if that really is the case? I think many of us experience that the bigger something gets the worse it becomes. Or maybe that growth to a certain point is good but then beyond that starts becoming a net negative.

Dan Thornton 09 Jun 09

Oddly enough I just moved from a large company to a much smaller one in terms of employees etc, and it’s down to the changing economy and methods of business in the UK.

It’s faster, more responsive, more flexible and more intuitive.

But it does come with a caveat – although the company is lean in terms of numbers, it does have significant resources in a parent company, which effectively gives us the best of both worlds.

Adam Wood 11 Jun 09

The article made me yo-yo back and forth between giggling and nausea. Of course power is shifting away from the big firms. And it isn’t just the economy. The market for everything is shifting away from the old guard and towards the long tail of innovation, creativity, and niche specialization.

I know more than a few law firms that are experiencing double-digit growth. Tell them that a recession is bad for business.

I wrote a response to the NY Times article, which you can read here.

Thanks, 37Signals, for bringing this article to my attention.

Anonymous Coward 15 Jun 09

gfgdf

Comments are closed