37signals logo

This is Signal vs. Noise, a weblog by 37signals about design, business, experience, simplicity, the web, culture, and more. Established 1999 in Chicago. Follow us on Twitter for more information on our products.

Jobs:

See more on our Job Board.

Watched by Matt on July 28 2010:

SVA Dot Dot Dot Lectures: Jason Santa Maria on web vs. print. “These things might seem obvious, but they’re not the conversations we’re having.” (via RS)

Looking for a job? Got a position to fill? Check out the Job Board.
Got a web design project in mind? Find a web designer on Sortfolio. Browse by visual style, portfolio, budget, and geographic location.
Over 1 million people use 37signals' simple web-based software to collaborate on projects, track contacts, and organize their business with an intranet.

8 comments so far

Andreas 28 Jul 10

A little purple icon? Is that all?

Bijan 28 Jul 10

Lol… I loved the lack of ROYGBIV .

Mike 28 Jul 10

One of the differences between print vs. web that I think Jason Santa Maria isn’t taking into account is that the web is much more ephemeral, and really great design is only economically worthwhile for things that have enduring value. I think this has more influence over the quality of design on the web than flexible viewports.

Jason Santa Maria 28 Jul 10

@Mike: I actually did touch on that in the full version of the hour long talk, this was just a condensed 10-minute version. But, I actually don’t think this should be a roadblock to good design online, we just need to approach it differently.

John 28 Jul 10

@Jason Santa Maria

What font is that in the title slide? (“The Influence of Print Design”)

Jason Santa Maria 28 Jul 10

@John

It’s one of my favorite sans serifs, Auto from Undeware.

John 29 Jul 10

@Jason Santa Maria

Thank you!

Mike 29 Jul 10

@Jason: It seems like your overall point is that designers can’t dig their heels in and insist on the traditional ways of doing things, we need to adapt and find new approaches. I don’t disagree with that, but here’s something that I think is being lost: resistance to technology isn’t only a defining trait of a luddite, it’s also a trait of a hacker. Yes, designers should adapt to the new technology, and focusing on the practices and techniques internal to design is that way to do that. But I think here you aren’t paying enough attention to the economic and technological factors that limit the success of design, which means surrendering a valuable critical perspective. For example, I think there are parallels between Nicholas Carr’s argument in The Shallows about the effects of ephemeral digital culture on our ability to concentrate and think deeply. Doesn’t design also suffer? What about the cognitive impairment created by bad design?

In the end, I think the adaption should go both ways: technology also needs to adapt to design practices, which is an idea I’m sure you’ll agree with, since it’s also behind your recent blog post about creating a real web design tool.

Comments are closed