This is Signal vs. Noise, a weblog by 37signals about design, business, experience, simplicity, the web, culture, and more. Established 1999 in Chicago. Visit the Product Blog for more information on our products.

GOD YES . the fact that you have to search for a place, then click on the place name (“You searched for ‘Omaha, NE’ Are you looking for Omaha, NE, USA ?”) then click on the 10 day forcast drives me INSANE . When planning my last road trip, I ended up using a different site simply because it was so frustrating having to click so many times to find out the weather on weather.com

I used to hate it when they would trick me with the text input boxes… Example: this one

...blame me the anxious user for not reading carefully, but when I type “weather.com” into my address bar, I’m immediately looking for a text box for my zip code… the “pet forcast” or Ski, or Park or whatever was always “center stage” and carrying the most visual weight and the actual weather search was blending in the header, so I would click there without reading too closely.

I seems this has been changed slightly these days.

They’re messed up – use Google instead: http://www.google.com/search?q=chicago+weather

There decision is all about page views – giving the weather on the results page cuts a page view, thus reducing their advertising clout and revenue. This way, users go to the root, then the search results, then the city page and possibly even a 4th for the 10-day forecast. 4 page views and associated revenues vs. 2 (or even if they had some asynchronous results). Bad user experience presently makes more advertising money in the short term. Just look at myspace…

I gave up on weather.com long ago – try the NOAA site:

http://www.crh.noaa.gov/zones/PAZ070.php?zo=1

No ads or other distractions – just weather info!

Weather.com is very frustrating. If you type “troy, mi”. It gives you two choices: Troy, MI and New Troy, MI. Why do I have to pick when I typed exactly what I wanted??

If you are looking for something simple . . .

http://www.weatherreports.com/chicago

That’s because weather.com sucks ass. And yet, I still use it.

Yahoo! Weather is broken too. Try this:

On weather.yahoo.com enter “94070” (the zip for “San Carlos, CA”).

Click “GO”

You see:

We found several matches for “94070” Select the one you want:

WTF ? So it turns out there is a San Carlos Mexico, but you can be guaranteed it doesn’t have the zip code 94070. What could be a more precise indicator of user intent than a zipcode?

Then when I click “San Carlos, CA 94070 ” from my “Recent Locations” I get the weather for “San Carlos Centro Argentina.”

Re: Dean

Here Here! It’s amazes me that a site like Weather.com can exist when there are so many other better weather resources out there like NOAA .gov.

Not sure what they really offer besides an easy to remember domain name. Talk about bad signal to noise!

You can get all that weather you’re looking for, but only after you click on the “weather in 1-click” link in the header.

Of course, to get your 1-link to weather, you have to give up your personal details and advertising preferences for their CRM types to add to their marketing database.

Marketing and monetization have their place in the world, but so many are so rotten at implementing it.

Weather.com is a disaster; its hard to believe that they are still the most popular destination for getting forecasts. I pointed this out on my blog about a month ago and also discussed what a radically simpler weather site might look like. As David implied, most of the site’s value seems to derive from their domain name. Its only a matter of time before someone disrupts weather.com.

Weather.com is a disaster; its hard to believe that they are still the most popular destination for getting forecasts. I pointed this out on my blog about a month ago and also discussed what a radically simpler weather site might look like. As David implied, most of the site’s value seems to derive from their domain name. Its only a matter of time before someone disrupts weather.com.

I wonder if people that are searching with zip codes are locals and those searching by city name are more likely to be visiting. It’s either annoying that they do that or an interesting marketing strategy.

I’m not sure who’s making the decisions, but until they get someone that knows what they’re doing…

http://www.wunderground.com/

Check out the mobile version too.

Google and NOAA do a good job, but I still think Unisys is on top by far. I lose a little neighborhood specificity, but I can access the basics on a quick-loading page very easily. And if you poke around just a little bit you can find some really cool raw data.

I’ve always thought that intellicast.com was a much better service than weather.com. The big plus is that their weather icons are nice, clean and easy to understand.

Accuweather.com does a really nice job in presenting the information as well.

I’ve been bitching about this for ages, and even sent them e-mail saying it was annoying. If I only get one result, just take me there!

One nice upgrade though… they do have an auto-complete for places you’ve already looked up.

I can’t stand weather.com anymore – their weather pages are over 50% ads and I have to scroll to see a forecast. I enjoy http://www.wunderground.com/

Weather.com drives me nuts too. I’m a big fan of http://www.forecastadvisor.com/.

The decision-makers on this type of feature are likely so high up that they’re unaffected by weather and subsequently have never used their own site.

Well said!

Have to agree with Jeremy…

wunderground is a terrific weather site.

TUCSON ! That is where i am from…are you heading that way, or was that just a random city you mentioned?

That’s why I just use the default weather Dashboard widget instead. It’s not the most accurate for my area but it’s close enough to go by for getting dressed in the morning.

For another option, you could try weather.gov.

I’ve just memorized the url to weather for my area (zip):

http://www.weather.com/weather/local/22182

You get used to it after a while. Less hassle than searching!

Where did my post go? I was saying the BBC does great weather forecasts online….

North America

and on tv….

UK Forecast

(Far better than any US weather forecast I have ever seen)